4.8 Article

Thymic stromal lymphopoietin induces adipose loss through sebum hypersecretion

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 373, 期 6554, 页码 532-+

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.abd2893

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01HL111501, R01-AI121250, R01-AR070116, T32-HL07439]
  2. Doris Duke Charitable Foundation
  3. University of Pennsylvania Medical Scientist Training Program
  4. Penn Diabetes Endocrine Research Center Grant [P30-DK19525]
  5. Cutaneous Phenomics and Transcriptomics Core in the Penn Skin Biology and Disease Resource-Based Center [P30-AR069589]
  6. University of Michigan Mouse Metabolic Phenotyping Center [U2-CDK110768]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals a new mechanism in which the immune system regulates systemic metabolism, with T cells inducing white adipose loss through excessive sebum secretion. This adipose loss protects against obesity, improves glucose metabolism, and is not caused by alterations in food intake, absorption, or energy expenditure. The findings highlight the role of adaptive immunity in skin barrier function through sebum secretion.
Emerging studies indicate that the immune system can regulate systemic metabolism. Here, we show that thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) stimulates T cells to induce selective white adipose loss, which protects against obesity, improves glucose metabolism, and mitigates nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Unexpectedly, adipose loss was not caused by alterations in food intake, absorption, or energy expenditure. Rather, it was induced by the excessive loss of lipids through the skin as sebum. TSLP and T cells regulated sebum release and sebum-associated antimicrobial peptide expression in the steady state. In human skin, TSLP expression correlated directly with sebum-associated gene expression. Thus, we establish a paradigm in which adipose loss can be achieved by means of sebum hypersecretion and uncover a role for adaptive immunity in skin barrier function through sebum secretion.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据