4.8 Article

Antibody fucosylation predicts disease severity in secondary dengue infection

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 372, 期 6546, 页码 1102-+

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.abc7303

关键词

-

资金

  1. Howard Hughes Medical Institute (HHMI)-Wellcome Trust [208710/Z/17/Z]
  2. National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) [R01AI137276, U19AI111825]
  3. Rockefeller University
  4. EU Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/20072011)
  5. NHLBI [HHSN268201100001I]
  6. Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.
  7. Department of Health and Human Services, Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority [HHSO100201600010C]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Antibodies against dengue virus can enhance disease susceptibility instead of providing protection. The fucosylation status of IgG1 plays a key role in predicting dengue disease severity, while antibody titers and neutralizing activity do not correlate with disease severity. Thus, IgG1 fucosylation status can serve as a robust prognostic tool for dengue disease.
Although antiviral antibodies generally confer protective functions, antibodies against dengue virus (DENV) are associated with enhanced disease susceptibility. Antibodies can mediate DENV infection of leukocytes via Fcg receptors, likely contributing to dengue disease pathogenesis. To determine if this mechanism accounts for variable disease severity, we examined Fab and Fc structures of anti-DENV antibodies from patients before and after infection and with variable disease outcomes. Neither antibody titers nor neutralizing activity correlated with disease severity in DENV-infected populations. Rather, DENV infection induced a specific increase in immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) afucosylation, and the levels of afucosylated IgG1 were predictive of dengue disease severity. Thus, the IgG1 fucosylation status represents a robust prognostic tool for dengue disease, highlighting the key role of the Fc glycan structure in dengue pathogenesis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据