4.8 Article

Vaccine nationalism and the dynamics and control of SARS-CoV-2

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 373, 期 6562, 页码 1488-+

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.abj7364

关键词

-

资金

  1. Open Philanthropy
  2. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
  3. Cooperative Institute for Modelling the Earth System (CIMES)
  4. James S. McDonnell Foundation 21st Century Science Initiative Collaborative Award in Understanding Dynamic and Multi-scale Systems
  5. C3.ai Digital Transformation Institute
  6. Microsoft Corporation
  7. National Science Foundation [CNS-2027908, CCF1917819]
  8. US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  9. Flu Lab

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Unequal vaccine distribution may lead to an increase in cases and the emergence of new variants, emphasizing the importance of rapid and equitable vaccine distribution for global pandemic control.
Vaccines provide powerful tools to mitigate the enormous public health and economic costs that the ongoing severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic continues to exert globally, yet vaccine distribution remains unequal among countries. To examine the potential epidemiological and evolutionary impacts of vaccine nationalism, we extend previous models to include simple scenarios of stockpiling between two regions. In general, when vaccines are widely available and the immunity they confer is robust, sharing doses minimizes total cases across regions. A number of subtleties arise when the populations and transmission rates in each region differ, depending on evolutionary assumptions and vaccine availability. When the waning of natural immunity contributes most to evolutionary potential, sustained transmission in low-access regions results in an increased potential for antigenic evolution, which may result in the emergence of novel variants that affect epidemiological characteristics globally. Overall, our results stress the importance of rapid, equitable vaccine distribution for global control of the pandemic.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据