4.8 Article

Embryo-scale, single-cell spatial transcriptomics

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 373, 期 6550, 页码 111-+

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.abb9536

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH [1U54HL145611, UM1HG011586, 1R01HG010632, DP2HL137188, T32EB1650]
  2. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft [SP1532/3-1, SP1532/4-1, SP1532/5-1]
  3. Brotman Baty Institute for Precision Medicine
  4. Paul G. Allen Frontiers Foundation (Allen Discovery Center grant)
  5. Washington Research Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study introduces a method called sci-Space, which allows for spatial heterogeneity analysis at larger scales while retaining single-cell resolution. By applying this method to developing mouse embryos, the researchers identified thousands of genes exhibiting anatomically patterned expression and leveraged spatial information to annotate cellular subtypes. The results show substantial variation in spatial patterning among cell types and reveal correlations between pseudotime and the migratory patterns of differentiating neurons.
Spatial patterns of gene expression manifest at scales ranging from local (e.g., cell-cell interactions) to global (e.g., body axis patterning). However, current spatial transcriptomics methods either average local contexts or are restricted to limited fields of view. Here, we introduce sci-Space, which retains single-cell resolution while resolving spatial heterogeneity at larger scales. Applying sci-Space to developing mouse embryos, we captured approximate spatial coordinates and whole transcriptomes of about 120,000 nuclei. We identify thousands of genes exhibiting anatomically patterned expression, leverage spatial information to annotate cellular subtypes, show that cell types vary substantially in their extent of spatial patterning, and reveal correlations between pseudotime and the migratory patterns of differentiating neurons. Looking forward, we anticipate that sci-Space will facilitate the construction of spatially resolved single-cell atlases of mammalian development.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据