4.8 Review

Strategies for durable β cell replacement in type 1 diabetes

期刊

SCIENCE
卷 373, 期 6554, 页码 516-521

出版社

AMER ASSOC ADVANCEMENT SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1126/science.abh1657

关键词

-

资金

  1. NIH NIDDK [HIRN UG3 DK122638, R01s DK126413, DK122638, R01 DK106191, R01 DK120444]
  2. NIH NIDDK (HIRN new investigator award)
  3. NIH NIAID [P01 AI042288, R21 AI140044]
  4. JDRF [3-SRA-2021-1033-S-B, 2-SRA-2019-781-S-B]
  5. Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
  6. Culshaw Junior Investigator Award in Diabetes
  7. Children's Diabetes Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Advancements in blood glucose monitoring and therapeutic insulin administration have improved the quality of life for individuals with type 1 diabetes, but still fall short of the metabolic control provided by native islets. Integrated advancements in islet cell replacement and immunomodulatory therapies are offering hope for the restoration of endogenous glucose regulation. Progress in stem cell biology and graft site design are providing innovative sources for cellular material and improved engraftment.
Technological advancements in blood glucose monitoring and therapeutic insulin administration have improved the quality of life for people with type 1 diabetes. However, these efforts fall short of replicating the exquisite metabolic control provided by native islets. We examine the integrated advancements in islet cell replacement and immunomodulatory therapies that are coalescing to enable the restoration of endogenous glucose regulation. We highlight advances in stem cell biology and graft site design, which offer innovative sources of cellular material and improved engraftment. We also cover cutting-edge approaches for preventing allograft rejection and recurrent autoimmunity. These insights reflect a growing understanding of type 1 diabetes etiology, beta cell biology, and biomaterial design, together highlighting therapeutic opportunities to durably replace the beta cells destroyed in type 1 diabetes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据