4.1 Review

Revised guidelines of the French Headache Society for the diagnosis and management of migraine in adults. Part 1: Diagnosis and assessment

期刊

REVUE NEUROLOGIQUE
卷 177, 期 7, 页码 725-733

出版社

MASSON EDITEUR
DOI: 10.1016/j.neurol.2021.07.001

关键词

Migraine; Guidelines; Diagnosis; Migraine severe; HIT-6

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The French Headache Society has proposed updated guidelines for managing migraines, focusing on diagnosis, risk factors, treatment efficacy, and follow-up plans. Recommendations include precise diagnosis based on ICHD-3 criteria, assessment of disability using HIT-6, checking for factors increasing chronic migraine risk, evaluating current treatments with M-TOQ, and providing strategies for pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments.
The French Headache Society proposes updated French guidelines for the management of migraine. The first part of these recommendations is focused on the diagnosis and assessment of migraine. First, migraine needs to be precisely diagnosed according to the currently validated criteria of the International Classification of Headache Disorders, 3d version (ICHD-3). Migraine-related disability has to be assessed and we suggest to use the 6 questions of the headache impact test (HIT-6). Then, it is important to check for risk factors and comorbidities increasing the risk to develop chronic migraine, especially frequency of headaches, acute medication overuse and presence of depression. We suggest to use a migraine calendar and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale (HAD). It is also necessary to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of current migraine treatments and we suggest to systematically use the self-administered Migraine Treatment Optimization Questionnaire (M-TOQ) for acute migraine treatment. Finally, a treatment strategy and a follow-up plan have to be proposed. Guidelines for pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatments are presented in the second and third part of the recommendations. (C) 2021 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.1
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据