4.0 Review

Capillary leak syndrome: State of the art in 2021

期刊

REVUE DE MEDECINE INTERNE
卷 42, 期 11, 页码 789-796

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.revmed.2021.05.012

关键词

Capillary leak syndrome; Vascular leak syndrome; Clarkson's disease; Clarkson's syndrome

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Capillary leak syndrome (CLS) is a multifaceted and potentially lethal disease characterized by diffuse severe edema and hypovolemia. It is mainly triggered by drugs, malignancy, infections, and inflammatory diseases. The pathophysiology involves severe endothelial disruption, and treatment includes symptomatic care and prophylactic use of immunoglobulins.
Capillary leak syndrome (CLS) is an increasingly acknowledged multifaceted and potentially lethal disease. Initial nonspecific symptoms are followed by the intriguing CLS hallmark: the double paradox associating diffuse severe edema and hypovolemia, along with hemoconcentration and hypoalbuminemia. Spontaneous resolutive phase is often associated with poor outcome due to iatrogenic fluid overload during leak phase. CLS is mainly triggered by drugs (anti-tumoral therapies), malignancy, infections (mostly viruses) and inflammatory diseases. Its idiopathic form is named after its eponymous finder: Clarkson's disease. CLS pathophysiology involves a severe, transient and multifactorial endothelial disruption which mechanisms are still unclear. Empirical and based-on-experience treatment implies symptomatic care during the acute phase (with the eventual addition of drugs amplifying cAMP levels in the severest cases), and the prophylactic use of monthly polyvalent immunoglobulins to prevent relapses. As CLS literature is scattered, we aimed to collect and summarize the current knowledge on CLS to facilitate its diagnosis, understanding and management. (C) 2021 Societe Nationale Francaise de Medecine Interne (SNFMI). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据