4.5 Article

An experiment for novel material thin-film solar cell characterization on sounding rocket flights

期刊

REVIEW OF SCIENTIFIC INSTRUMENTS
卷 92, 期 7, 页码 -

出版社

AIP Publishing
DOI: 10.1063/5.0047346

关键词

-

资金

  1. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, German Research Foundation) under Germany's Excellence Strategy [EXC 2089/1-390776260]
  2. International Research Training Group 2022 Alberta/Technical University of Munich International Graduate School for Environmentally Responsible Functional Materials (ATUMS)
  3. TUM.solar
  4. department Base Mobile Rocket (MORABA) of the DLR Space Operations and Astronaut Training

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Novel thin-film solar cells show promise as future alternatives for space applications, with previous terrestrial studies demonstrating stability under simulated space conditions. The OHSCIS sounding rocket experiment successfully characterized the electronic behavior of Organic and Hybrid Solar Cells In Space, providing valuable insights for future space missions involving solar technology. The mechanical and electronic design of the experiment aimed to maximize data collection rate and scientific output, while ensuring fail-safety and precise measurements.
Novel material thin-film solar cells are promising alternatives to conventional solar cells for future space applications. Previous terrestrial investigations have shown promising stability under simulated space conditions, pioneering the next step to test these solar cells under space conditions. Here, we present the sounding rocket experiment OHSCIS to characterize the electronic behavior of Organic and Hybrid Solar Cells In Space (OHSCIS). The mechanical and electronic design aims at maximizing the rate of data collection and the fail-safety for high scientific output with precise measurements. The maiden flight onboard the MAPHEUS-8 proved the experimental concept to be successful and produced valuable results for the operation and behavior of perovskite and organic solar cells in space.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据