4.3 Article

New data about three sphenophylls and their spores from the volcanic tuff of Wuda, Taiyuan Formation, earliest Permian, China

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.revpalbo.2021.104484

关键词

Sphenophyllum; In situ spores; Monolete spores; Lowermost Permian; Wuda

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41530101]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB18030404]
  3. Grant Agency of the Czech Republic [19-06728S]
  4. research plan of the Institute of Geology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, v.v.i. [RVO67985831]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A new species of Sphenophyllum named Sphenophyllum parvifolium sp. nov. has been discovered in Wuda, Inner Mongolia, along with other related species and possible climbing structures. The study also provides information on the morphology of cones and spores, as well as the geological age of the plant-bearing tuff bed.
A new species Sphenophyllum parvifolium sp. nov. is proposed for a whole plant based on organically connected leafy shoots and cones from the Wuda locality, Inner Mongolia, North China. The most characteristic feature is the sporangiophore with lanceolate expansions bearing sporangia. Cones were studied morphologically, including cuticles and in situ spores. Cones yielded monolete spores of the Laevigatosporite.s or Latosporites type. Other sphenophylls from this locality include Sphenophyllum cf. oblongifolium and Sphenophyllum cf. angustifolium, both with associated cones yielding in situ spores of the same type as Sphenophyllum parvifolium, and sterile specimens of Sphenophyllum kawasakii. Some foliated axes of this type bear cones, but without in situ spores. Hooklike structures at the ends of leaf lobes of these Sphenophyllum species could have enabled the plants to climb. All species are from a volcanic tuff bed, between coal seams Nos. 6. and 7 in the Wuda Coalfield.The age of the plant-bearing tuff in the Taiyuan Formation is 298.34 +/- 0.09 Ma (Asselian, earliest Permian). (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据