4.7 Article

Impact of remanufacturing on the reduction of metal losses through the life cycles of vehicle engines

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105614

关键词

Remanufacturing; Recycling; Engine; Dynamic material flow analysis; Material dissipation avoidance

资金

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [KAKENHI 18H04147, 19H04328, 21K17918]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19H04328, 21K17918] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Remanufacturing extends product service life cycles and avoids material waste, potentially superior to material recycling. However, quantifying the effectiveness of remanufacturing is challenging due to the lack of indicators and tools designed for this task.
Remanufacturing gives a full new service life for every usage cycle of a product. Since remanufacturing avoids material dissipation, it is conceivably superior to material recycling. However, quantifying the effectiveness of remanufacturing is difficult due to the fundamental lack of indicators and supporting tools designed for the task. In this study, the volume of avoided material dissipation was adopted as an evaluation indicator to measure the effect of product service life extension. The circulation path of remanufacturing was incorporated to a dynamic material flow analysis model called the MaTrace model to quantify the effect of remanufacturing on the extent to which material dissipation was avoided over time through product life cycles. Through a case study of vehicle engines over a period of 50 years by applying the extended MaTrace model, a comparison with a case where used products were all recycled, revealed that extending product service life cycles through remanufacturing reduces the overall physical loss of steel, Ni, and Cr in the vehicle's engine by 3%, 2% and 5%, respectively. These results quantitatively clarify the superiority of engine remanufacturing over material recycling with respect to the effect of avoiding material dissipation in a circular resource system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据