4.7 Article

Settlement behavior and stratification of waste printed circuit boards particles in gravitational field

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105615

关键词

WPCBs; Gravity separation; Sedimentation; Settling velocity; Potential energy

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2019BEE055]
  2. Qingdao Postdoctoral Application Research Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Gravity separation is an effective technology for separating WPCBs particles. This study reveals the dynamic and static mechanisms of particles in the gravity concentration process, as well as the importance of particle size ratio.
Waste printed circuit board (WPCBs) is a kind of sustainable resource for providing economically valuable metals due to its huge output and excellent metal grade. Gravity separation is an effective pre-concentration technology to separate WPCBs particles with significant density difference. This study focuses on revealing the mechanism of gravity concentration from the perspective of dynamics and statics. The settling velocity of three kinds of particles in WPCBs (organic matter, glass fiber and metal particles) are calculated, which can be expressed by traditional settlement velocity model with correction coefficient. Subsequently, the equal-sedimentation model of the particles was established, and the calculation results show that the particle size ratio should be within 5.58. The lowest potential energy model was proposed to explain the stratification process of particles from the static point of view. The potential energy calculation results show that the stratification process dominated by density difference is spontaneous, which can achieve the lowest potential energy. Shaking table test shows that the metal particles with different sizes can be effectively enriched in the concentrates, and the metal grade increases with the decrease of particle size, from 56.5% to 68.2%, and the metal recovery decreases from 86.41% to 83.04%.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据