4.7 Article

Designing a Resilient International Reverse Logistics Network for Material Cycles: A Japanese Case Study

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105603

关键词

International reverse logistics; Network design; Resilience; Port; Maritime transportation; Japan

资金

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [19H04325]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [19H04325] Funding Source: KAKEN

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study highlights the importance of designing resilient international reverse logistics (IRL) networks in islands countries like Japan, with a focus on economic efficiency and resilience. The model suggests that expanding ports in remote areas with low storage costs can increase economies of scale and enhance the resilience of IRL networks.
With material cycles becoming more international, the design of international reverse logistics (IRL) networks has also become increasingly important, especially in island nations such as Japan, where maritime transportation plays a significant role. Nevertheless, few studies relate to IRL design, with most existing research focusing on economic efficiency. However, IRL networks' resilience is equally or even more important than the typical logistics network design. As developed countries-including Japan-are usually exporters of recyclables, IRL malfunctions can cause waste or recyclables to accumulate in these countries, leading to inefficient waste management practices, such as landfilling. As IRL networks are characterized by low transportation rates and other uncertainties, they must be able to absorb this volatility and function despite any disruptions. This study utilizes a Japanese case study of IRL networks to establish a model and design a resilient, efficient IRL network using a cost-minimization model with resilience constraints. Our model reveals that expanding ports in a remote area with inexpensive storage costs increases economies of scale while contributing to IRL networks' resilience by forming hubs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据