4.6 Review

Focus on time-lapse analysis: blastocyst collapse and morphometric assessment as new features of embryo viability

期刊

REPRODUCTIVE BIOMEDICINE ONLINE
卷 43, 期 5, 页码 821-832

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2021.08.008

关键词

Blastocyst collapse; Embryo viability; Morphometric blastocyst assessment; Pregnancy outcomes; Time-lapse monitoring; Undisturbed embryo culture

资金

  1. Ministry of Science and Universities CDTI-Eureka

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The main aim of assisted reproductive technology is to achieve a healthy singleton live birth, and the introduction of time-lapse monitoring technology has enabled embryologists to more accurately assess embryo status and implantation potential.
The main goal of assisted reproductive technology (ART) is to achieve a healthy singleton live birth after the transfer of one embryo. A major objective of IVF scientists has always been to use adequate criteria for selecting the embryo for transfer according to its implantation potential. Indeed, embryo quality is usually assessed by evaluating visual morphology, which relies on the removal of the embryo from the incubator and might include inter-and intraevaluator variation among embryologists. Recently, an advancement in embryo culture has taken place with the introduction of a new type of incubator with an integrated time-lapse monitoring system, which enables embryologists to analyse the dynamic events of embryo development from fertilization to blastocyst formation. This novel practice is rapidly growing and has been used in many IVF centres worldwide. Therefore, the main aim of this review is to present the benefits of time-lapse monitoring in a modern embryology laboratory; in particular, we discuss blastocyst collapse and morphometric blastocyst assessment, and analyse their association with embryo viability and implantation potential. In addition, we highlight preliminary studies involving artificial intelligence and machine learning models as non-invasive markers of clinical pregnancy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据