4.4 Article

Evaluating the use of piezo manipulator, laser or their combination for blastocoel cavity puncture to improve cryopreservation outcomes of large equine embryos

期刊

REPRODUCTION IN DOMESTIC ANIMALS
卷 56, 期 10, 页码 1358-1362

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/rda.13990

关键词

blastocoel fluid; cryopreservation; cryoprotectant; embryo; equine; laser pulse; piezo manipulator

资金

  1. Japan Racing Association

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study aimed to improve the cryopreservation of large equine embryos with the assistance of PMAP and/or LAP, showing potential for enhancing success rates. While embryos under 300 micrometers benefited from laser-assisted puncture, further investigation is needed for embryos larger than 700 micrometers to determine the best method for successful pregnancy outcomes.
The main difficulty of large equine embryo cryopreservation is the replacement of blastocoel fluid with cryoprotectant solution. The objective of this study was to improve the cryopreservation of large equine embryos with PMAP and/or LAP. Embryos were collected via the non-surgical transcervical procedure and divided into three groups based on their size (A <= 300 mu m, 300 mu m< 700 mu m and C >= 700 mu m). Six embryos 233-1360 mu m in diameter were punctured via piezo manipulator and/or laser pulse before cryopreservation. All embryos were cryopreserved on a Cryotop (R). Frozen-thawed embryos were cultured for 3h and transferred to the recipient mares. After one week, pregnancy was diagnosed by ultrasonography. Two of six embryos resulted in a positive pregnancy, the result of pregnancy in group A and B was positive, but in group C was negative, and further investigation is necessary for >= 700 mu m embryos. The results showed laser-assisted puncture could be helpful to extract blastocoel fluid and replace it with cryoprotectant. This is the first positive pregnancy report in laser puncture-assisted frozen-thawed equine embryo (>300 mu m). However, more research is required to find the best method for embryos >= 700 mu m.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.4
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据