4.7 Article

Assessment of renewable energy resources using new interval rough number extension of the level based weight assessment and combinative distance-based assessment

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 170, 期 -, 页码 1156-1177

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.004

关键词

Renewable energy resources; Solar energy; Wind energy; Interval rough numbers; Interval rough LBWA; Interval rough CODAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluates five renewable energy sources in Turkey using the IRN CODAS method, with hydropower energy ranking first. The study selected criteria from four groups including socio-political, environmental, economic, and technical through literature review and interviews to ensure comprehensive assessment.
Renewable Energy Resources (RERs) are becoming increasingly significant for energy generation and will have vital for the future of humans, earth, and other living things. Due to the negative environmental impacts of fossil fuels, the authorities have taken RERs into account further. As a result, the present study extended a novel model using the Level Based Weight Assessment (LBWA) model based on in Interval Rough Number (IRN) extension of the Combinative Distance-Based Assessment (CODAS) method to cope with uncertain domain-based RER selection. A survey method using literature review and interview has been conducted to find and select appropriate perspectives and criteria; in this regard, the selected criteria were classified based on four groups, including socio-political, environmental, economic, and technical. Five sources of renewable energy, including solar energy, biomass energy, wind energy, hydropower energy, and geothermal energy, are evaluated in Turkey. The results of the extended IRN CODAS approach demonstrated that hydropower energy had the first rank among other sources, followed by solar energy, geothermal energy, biomass energy, and wind energy. In the application of the suggested model, the most suitable RER alternative is determined for Turkey. The results of this study showed the effectiveness, efficiency, and capability of the proposed methodology in the assessment of RERs. (c) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据