4.7 Article

Particulate emissions from a modern wood stove - Influence of KCl

期刊

RENEWABLE ENERGY
卷 170, 期 -, 页码 1215-1227

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2021.02.048

关键词

Particulate matter; Wood stoves; Emissions; Potassium chloride; Soot

资金

  1. Danish Energy Technology Development and Demonstration Program [MUPOS 52254]
  2. Technical University of Denmark

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study explored the influence of potassium chloride (KCl) on fine particle emissions from wood burning. It was found that the presence of KCl led to a decrease in ultrafine particle emissions and an increase in emissions of larger particles. Additionally, the emission factors of organic compounds and soot particles increased with higher KCl content.
Particulate matter (PM) generated by residential wood combustion is a major environmental concern in Europe. This study focuses on the influence of potassium chloride (KCl) on fine particle emissions from a modern wood stove. Wood logs with and without KCl impregnation were subjected to batch combustion and emission measurements. A bi-modal particle number-size distribution characterized by a nucleation mode and an accumulation mode was identified for all types of wood fuel. However, in the presence of KCl, a lower number emission of ultrafine particles and a higher number emission of larger particles (size similar to 200-500 nm) were observed. In addition, the emission factor of condensed organic compounds (COC) increased with increasing KCl content, from 0.16 g/kg dry wood for normal wood (NW) to 0.48 g/kg dry wood for wood impregnated with the 2 mol/L KCl solution (HKW), most likely due to the facilitated heterogeneous condensation of semi-volatile hydrocarbons on pre-existing ash particles. In addition, the emission factor of soot particles also increased slightly when the KCl content was high, from 1.47 g/kg dry wood for NW to 2.23 g/kg dry wood for HKW. (C) 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据