4.7 Article

Uncertainty quantification and reduction in aircraft trajectory prediction using Bayesian-Entropy information fusion

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107650

关键词

Air traffic management; Bayesian-Entropy method; trajectory prediction; uncertainty

资金

  1. NASA University Leadership Initiative program [NNX17AJ86A]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper presents a Bayesian framework for accurate trajectory and accident prediction in the National Airspace System, offering a way to update simulation parameters for adverse incident diagnostics and prognostics.
Eliminating accidents while maintaining the integrity of the National Airspace System is one of the central objectives of the Next Generation Air Transportation System. This paper presents a Bayesian framework for accurate trajectory and accident prediction in National Airspace System using a high-fidelity trajectory simulation platform. Various uncertainties in aircraft trajectory prediction due to pilot behavior and weather effects are included as random variables in the simulations. Bayesian-Entropy method fuses available observation data (e.g., positioning system) with existing physical constraints (e.g. runway location) to update these simulation parameters. The posterior distributions of parameters are used to predict the probability of an adverse incident and time-remaining to incident. The proposed Bayesian updating scheme offers a flexible and rigorous way for adverse incident diagnostics and prognostics in current and future Air Traffic Management. Two realistic examples are given to show that it is possible to derive advance warning using the proposed methodology. The approach integrates data from a simulation model, with real-time traffic data streams and available physical constraints, using the Bayesian-Entropy information fusion methodology. This advance warning will allow the pilots/controllers to take actions to mitigate adverse incident in the National Airspace System.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据