4.7 Article

Dynamic pricing of two-dimensional extended warranty considering the impacts of product price fluctuations and repair learning

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107516

关键词

Dynamic pricing; Extended warranty price; Product price; Repair learning; Cumulative sales; Preventive maintenance

资金

  1. National Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [72032005, 71902180, 71532008]
  2. Civil Aviation Airport Group Smart Operation Key Laboratory Open Fund [KLAGIO20180302]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The paper proposes a dynamic integration model to address the issue of optimal extended warranty pricing strategy for dealers in a dynamic market, combining reliability engineering factors and market elements, and analyzing their effects on dealer profit.
Product prices fluctuate dynamically with changes in market supply and demand. This poses a dilemma for dealers, that is, dealers need to establish a dynamic extended warranty (EW) pricing strategy based on the fluctuations in product prices to attract consumers. To address this challenging issue, we establish a dynamic integration model to derive optimal product prices and two-dimensional (2D) EW prices in a multistage dynamic market environment to maximize the dealer's expected discounted profit during the product life cycle. In order to explore the dynamic influence mechanism between reliability engineering factors and market elements, this model combines the warranty cost model influenced by reliability related repair learning characteristics and the 2D EW demand model influenced by product price fluctuations. The model allows dealers to identify the relationships among various factors, including repair learning characteristic, production scale effect, product cost, EW cost in product reliability level, and fluctuating product demand and EW demand in market demand level, and more important, their effects, on the dealers' profit. The necessary optimality conditions and case study are conducted for static and dynamic markets.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据