4.7 Article

Robustness of maintenance support service networks: attributes, evaluation and improvement

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107526

关键词

Maintenance; Robustness; Maintenance support service networks; Complex network; Cascading failure

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2019YFE0105100]
  2. Research Council of Norway (AutoPRO) [309628]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study develops a two-layer MSSN and proposes a robustness definition and effect propagation models to evaluate its robustness, along with improvement strategies, including a new greedy partnership building approach. The results of the research show that this approach has a significant effect on the robustness of maintenance support service network.
Maintenance support service network (MSSN) is used to provide maintenance services and maintain the operational status of equipment. However, the performance of MSSN has been significantly influenced by inevitable disturbance, which makes it vital to maintain its robustness. Existing research on robustness of MSSN mainly focuses on single-layer rather than two-layer network, which imposes constraints on the disturbances and limits its application. To solve these issues, this study develops a two-layer MSSN, consisting of a directed entity-layer and an undirected cyber-layer focusing on supporting maintenance service. A definition of robustness for two-layer MSSN is proposed, and effect propagation models are established to evaluate its robustness of MSSN, followed by its improvement strategies. In particular, two strategies applied in the single-layer MSSN are modified to adapt to the two-layer MSSN, and a novel greedy partnership building approach is proposed to find an optimal strategy under cascading failure, to maintain the robustness of MSSN from a complex network perspective. Finally, numerical examples are presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据