4.7 Article

Remaining Useful Life Prediction and Optimal Maintenance Time Determination for a Single Unit Using Isotonic Regression and Gamma Process Model

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2021.107504

关键词

Cost constraint; Gamma process; Isotonic regression; Optimal maintenance time; Remaining useful life

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study presents a dynamic RUL prediction and OMT determination approach using a Gamma process model, which can significantly reduce the impact of random fluctuations on the accuracy of RUL prediction and facilitate real-time condition-based maintenance.
Degradation-based remaining useful life (RUL) prediction plays an important role in ensuring the reliability and safety of rotating machinery components. The accuracy of traditional models and methods is usually affected by the inevitable fluctuations in degradation signals. This paper proposes a dynamic RUL prediction and optimal maintenance time (OMT) determination approach using a Gamma process model. This approach can significantly reduce the effects of random fluctuations on the accuracy of RUL prediction, and facilitate the implementation of real-time condition-based maintenance. In particular, an isotonic regression based data preprocessing method, called pool-adjacent-violators algorithm, is first presented to smooth random fluctuations in degradation signals. Then, health stage identification is conducted by measuring the degradation gradient within a sliding window to characterize the degradation trend and identify the jump points. A Bayesian algorithm and a maximum likelihood estimation method are jointly utilized to update the model parameters and further predict the component's RUL. By considering both maintenance cost and failure risk of the component, an OMT determination method based on RUL prediction result is developed. A case study on rolling element bearings illustrates the superiority and effectiveness of the proposed approach in both RUL prediction and maintenance decision making.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据