4.7 Review

Recent advances in nanostructured electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction

期刊

RARE METALS
卷 40, 期 12, 页码 3375-3405

出版社

NONFERROUS METALS SOC CHINA
DOI: 10.1007/s12598-021-01735-y

关键词

Water splitting; Hydrogen evolution reaction; Electrocatalysts; Nanostructure; Metal

资金

  1. National Science and Technology Major Project [2017-VI-0013-0085]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [52001205]
  3. Shanghai Sailing Program [19YF1422600]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper introduces the basic principles of the hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) process and evaluates different categories of nanostructured electrocatalytic materials, providing guidance for the design and fabrication of nanostructured HER catalysts. The recent progress and future research directions regarding the performance of metallic nanostructured materials are also discussed.
Hydrogen is considered to be an ideal safe and clean energy source, which can be produced by water splitting. The high overpotential of hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) is one of the bottleneck issues for the practical application of water splitting, where high-efficiency electrocatalysts are thus usually required to accommodate and facilitate the reaction. In recent years, a rapid rise in the HER electrocatalysts has been witnessed, especially nanostructured materials. Noble metals are generally regarded as the most effective electrocatalysts for HER, while some other electrocatalysts based on non-noble transition metals, including alloys, chalcogenides, phosphides, carbides and nitrides, can even approach the HER efficiency of noble metal benchmarks. This paper mainly introduces the basic principles of the HER process, evaluates different categories of nanostructured electrocatalytic materials, providing guidance for the design and fabrication of nanostructured HER catalysts. Moreover, recent progress and future research directions regarding the performance of metallic nanostructured materials are also discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据