4.5 Article

Establishing Quality and Safety in Hospital-based 3D Printing Pro- grams: Patient-first Approach

期刊

RADIOGRAPHICS
卷 41, 期 4, 页码 1208-1229

出版社

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA (RSNA)
DOI: 10.1148/rg.2021200175

关键词

-

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The adoption of 3D printing in hospitals is increasing rapidly, but also comes with the risk of potential errors and decreased quality for patients. Establishing a strong quality management system is crucial to improving product quality and reducing errors. Repetitive tasks in traditional care processes can harm patient care in the long run.
The adoption of three-dimensional (3D) printing is rapidly spreading across hospitals, and the complexity of 3D-printed models and devices is growing. While exciting, the rapid growth and increasing complexity also put patients at increased risk for potential errors and decreased quality of the final product. More than ever, a strong quality management system (QMS) must be in place to identify potential errors, mitigate those errors, and continually enhance the quality of the product that is delivered to patients. The continuous repetition of the traditional processes of care, without insight into the positive or negative impact, is ultimately detrimental to the delivery of patient care. Repetitive tasks within a process can be measured, refined, and improved and translate into high levels of quality, and the same is true within the 3D printing process. The authors share their own experiences and growing pains in building a QMS into their 3D printing processes. They highlight errors encountered along the way, how they were addressed, and how they have strived to improve consistency, facilitate communication, and replicate successes. They also describe the vital intersection of health care providers, regulatory groups, and traditional manufacturers, who contribute essential elements to a common goal of providing quality and safety to patients. (C) RSNA, 2021

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据