相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。The minimal perceived change: a formal model of the responder definition according to the patient's meaning of change for patient-reported outcome data analysis and interpretation
Antoine Vanier et al.
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY (2021)
Evaluating the credibility of anchor based estimates of minimal important differences for patient reported outcomes: instrument development and reliability study
Tahira Devji et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2020)
Minimal important differences for improvement in shoulder condition patient-reported outcomes: a systematic review to inform a BMJ Rapid Recommendation
Qiukui Hao et al.
BMJ OPEN (2019)
Developing a real-time electronic symptom monitoring system for patients after discharge following cancer-related surgery
Kerry N. L. Avery et al.
BMC CANCER (2019)
Estimation of minimally important differences and responder definitions for EORTC QLQ-MY20 scores in multiple myeloma patients
Kate Sully et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY (2019)
PNS366 UNDERSTANDING THE ROLE OF ANCHOR CORRELATIONS IN THE CALCULATION OF MEANINGFUL CHANGE THRESHOLDS FOR HEALTH-RELATED QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
P. Griffiths et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2019)
Minimally Important Differences for Interpreting EORTC QLQ-C30 Scores in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer
Jammbe Z. Musoro et al.
JNCI CANCER SPECTRUM (2019)
Evaluating minimal important differences and responder definitions for the asthma symptom diary in patients with moderate to severe asthma
Gary Globe et al.
JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES (2019)
Methods and impact of engagement in research, from theory to practice and back again: early findings from the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
Laura Forsythe et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2018)
Minimum clinically important differences in chronic pain vary considerably by baseline pain and methodological factors: systematic review of empirical studies
Mette Frahm Olsen et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2018)
Lack of group-to-individual generalizabilityis a threat to human subjects research
Aaron J. Fisher et al.
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (2018)
Interpreting European Organisation for Research and Treatment for Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire core 30 scores as minimally importantly different for patients with malignant melanoma
Jammbe Z. Musoro et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER (2018)
Distribution- and anchor-based methods to determine the minimally important difference on patient-reported outcome questionnaires in oncology: a structured review
Ahmad Ousmen et al.
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES (2018)
Important differences and meaningful changes for the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Cognitive Function (FACT-Cog)
M. L. Bell et al.
JOURNAL OF PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES (2018)
Estimation of the biserial correlation and its sampling variance for use in meta-analysis
Perke Jacobs et al.
RESEARCH SYNTHESIS METHODS (2017)
Responsiveness and Minimally Important Differences for 4 Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Short Forms: Physical Function, Pain Interference, Depression, and Anxiety in Knee Osteoarthritis
Augustine C. Lee et al.
JOURNAL OF PAIN (2017)
Minimally Important Differences in Patient or Proxy-Reported Outcome Studies Relevant to Children: A Systematic Review
Shanil Ebrahim et al.
PEDIATRICS (2017)
Application of minimal important differences in degenerative knee disease outcomes: a systematic review and case study to inform BMJ Rapid Recommendations
Tahira Devji et al.
BMJ OPEN (2017)
Pain relief that matters to patients: systematic review of empirical studies assessing the minimum clinically important difference in acute pain
Mette Frahm Olsen et al.
BMC MEDICINE (2017)
Interpreting Change in Scores on Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments
Cheryl D. Coon et al.
THERAPEUTIC INNOVATION & REGULATORY SCIENCE (2016)
Interpreting change from patient reported outcome (PRO) endpoints: patient global ratings of concept versus patient global ratings of change, a case study among osteoporosis patients
Annabel Nixon et al.
HEALTH AND QUALITY OF LIFE OUTCOMES (2016)
Implications of the Minimal Clinically Important Difference for Health-Related Quality-of-Life Outcomes: A Comparison of Sample Size Requirements for an Incontinence Treatment Trial
Alex S. Halme et al.
VALUE IN HEALTH (2015)
Minimally important difference estimates and methods: a protocol
Bradley C. Johnston et al.
BMJ OPEN (2015)
Testing the measurement invariance of the EORTC QLQ-C30 across primary cancer sites using multi-group confirmatory factor analysis
D. S. J. Costa et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2015)
Converting From d to r to z When the Design Uses Extreme Groups, Dichotomization, or Experimental Control
James E. Pustejovsky
PSYCHOLOGICAL METHODS (2014)
Different minimally important clinical difference (MCID) scores lead to different clinical prediction rules for the Oswestry disability index for the same sample of patients
Julie Schwind et al.
JOURNAL OF MANUAL & MANIPULATIVE THERAPY (2013)
Evidence-based guidelines for interpreting change scores for the European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30
K. Cocks et al.
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER (2012)
Baseline Dependency of Minimal Clinically Important Improvement
Ying-Chih Wang et al.
PHYSICAL THERAPY (2011)
Determining the non-inferiority margin for patient reported outcomes
Christoph Gerlinger et al.
PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS (2011)
Interpreting patient-reported outcome results: US FDA guidance and emerging methods
Lori D. McLeod et al.
EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH (2011)
A point of minimal important difference (MID): a critique of terminology and methods
Madeleine T. King
EXPERT REVIEW OF PHARMACOECONOMICS & OUTCOMES RESEARCH (2011)
Mind the MIC: large variation among populations and methods
Caroline B. Terwee et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2010)
Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes
Dennis Revicki et al.
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
Triangulating patient and clinician perspectives on clinically important differences in health-related quality of life among patients with heart disease
Kathleen W. Wyrwich et al.
HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH (2007)
Sample size determination for logistic regression revisited
Eugene Demidenko
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE (2007)
Minimally important change determined by a visual method integrating an anchor-based and a distribution-based approach
Henrica C. W. de Vet et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2007)
Confidence intervals for the Youden index and corresponding optimal cut-point
Enrique F. Schisterman et al.
COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-SIMULATION AND COMPUTATION (2007)
分享论文
