4.5 Article

Parent-child discrepancies in health-related quality of life of children and adolescents with myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome

期刊

QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
卷 30, 期 12, 页码 3443-3448

出版社

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-021-02919-w

关键词

Chronic fatigue syndrome; Myalgic encephalomyelitis; Parent-child agreement; Health-related quality of life; Proxy report

资金

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [HD072208]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study reveals discrepancies between parent-child reports of ME/CFS symptomatology and HRQOL measures, regardless of whether the children have ME/CFS symptoms or are in the control group. Further research is needed to explore these differences.
Purpose Few studies have examined parent-child discrepancies on self-report measures of myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS) symptomatology and health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The aim of this study was to investigate parent-child reporting discrepancies between a pediatric sample of diagnosed patients with ME/CFS and controls to better understand the role of children and adolescent reporting. Method Data for this study were drawn from a community-based epidemiological study of pediatric ME/CFS in the Chicagoland area. A total of 147 parent-child dyads (75 pairs with ME/CFS and 72 control pairs) completed measures assessing HRQOL and ME/CFS symptomatology. At the individual level, agreement was assessed using intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) scores. Agreement was measured at the group level by a comparison of means using paired-sample t-tests. Results Intra-class correlations revealed varied agreement in both parent-child pairs of children who met at least one case definition of ME/CFS and in parent-child pairs in the control group. Conclusion The current study provides support for the existence of discrepancies between parent-child reports of ME/CFS symptomatology and HRQOL measures. Limitations and future directions are discussed.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据