4.6 Article

How do you develop systems leadership in public health? Insights from a scoping study

期刊

PUBLIC HEALTH
卷 196, 期 -, 页码 24-28

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.04.033

关键词

Public health; Systems leadership; Training and development

资金

  1. Public Health England

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study examines how to develop public health professionals into effective systems leaders, and identifies key principles and a framework for systems leadership development approach that can be applied to any public health system.
Objectives: Systems leadership is widely acknowledged to be needed to address the many 'wicked issues' challenging public health systems. However, there is a lack of evidence on how to develop public health professionals into effective systems leaders. This study scoped the possibilities for developing the systems leadership capacity of public health specialists in England. Study design: This was a mixed-methods qualitative scoping study design. Methods: The study involved three stages. In the first, a rapid literature review mapped key documents in three relevant areas: systems leadership theory and practice, the changing context of public health in the UK, and training and development for UK public health professionals. In the second, 29 stakeholders were consulted to understand the context and needs for systems leadership development in public health. A third phase involved stakeholders codesigning a potential development framework for the project commissioners. Results: Four main themes were identified: the nature and purpose of systems leadership; development needs and opportunities for public health specialists; the enabling environment; and wider contextual factors impacting public health. Conclusions: Key principles of, and a framework for, a systems leadership development approach are identified, which could be applied to any public health system. (C) 2021 The Royal Society for Public Health. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据