4.0 Article

Uncompleted extended suicide - discussion on the boundaries of psychosis based on a case study

期刊

PSYCHIATRIA POLSKA
卷 56, 期 6, 页码 19-19

出版社

WYDAWNICZY POLSKIEGO TOWARZYSTWA
DOI: 10.12740/PP/OnlineFirst/135902

关键词

suicide; homicide; forensic psychiatry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article describes a case of a 40-year-old woman who attempted suicide and killed her two children. The woman was examined by three teams of forensic psychiatrists and psychologists. After conducting double psychiatric and psychological examinations and analyzing the case files, the authors identified symptoms of dependent personality disorders and acute stress reaction, which resulted in a complete loss of the ability to recognize the meaning of the act and to manage proceeding.
The article describes the case of a 40-year-old woman who attempted suicide and killed two of her own children and was examined by three teams of forensic psychiatrists and psychologists for the purpose of judiciary. This women was somatically healthy, did not use psychiatric or psychological help. The authors were the third team of experts and, after conducting double psychiatric and psychological examinations and analysis of documents from the case files, which include the course of forensic-psychiatric observation, recognized the symptoms of dependant personality disorders and acute stress reaction, which resulted in a complete loss of the ability to recognize the meaning of the act and to manage proceeding. The paper discusses the diagnostic process as well as the analysis of psychotic disorders in relation to specific clinical diagnoses in accordance with the current classification of mental illnesses and disorders. Attention was paid to the problem of differentiating individual dis-orders and the way of defining psychotic disorders. The existence of difficulties in drawing the line between psychotic and non-psychotic disorders in the context of forensic psychiatric evaluation is emphasized.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.0
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据