4.3 Article

Critical assessment of methods of protein structure prediction (CASP)-Round XIV

期刊

PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND BIOINFORMATICS
卷 89, 期 12, 页码 1607-1617

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/prot.26237

关键词

alphafold; CASP; community wide experiment; protein folding; protein structure prediction

资金

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [R01GM100482]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CASP is a community experiment aimed at advancing methods for computing three-dimensional protein structure, including rigorous blind testing and evaluation by independent assessors. In the recent CASP14 experiment, deep-learning methods from one research group consistently delivered computed structures rivaling the corresponding experimental ones in accuracy. These results represent a solution to the classical protein-folding problem, at least for single proteins.
Critical assessment of structure prediction (CASP) is a community experiment to advance methods of computing three-dimensional protein structure from amino acid sequence. Core components are rigorous blind testing of methods and evaluation of the results by independent assessors. In the most recent experiment (CASP14), deep-learning methods from one research group consistently delivered computed structures rivaling the corresponding experimental ones in accuracy. In this sense, the results represent a solution to the classical protein-folding problem, at least for single proteins. The models have already been shown to be capable of providing solutions for problematic crystal structures, and there are broad implications for the rest of structural biology. Other research groups also substantially improved performance. Here, we describe these results and outline some of the many implications. Other related areas of CASP, including modeling of protein complexes, structure refinement, estimation of model accuracy, and prediction of inter-residue contacts and distances, are also described.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据