4.2 Article

Optimal secretion of thermostable Beta-glucosidase in Bacillus subtilis by signal peptide optimization

期刊

PROTEIN EXPRESSION AND PURIFICATION
卷 182, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.pep.2021.105843

关键词

Thermostable beta-glucosidase; Signal peptide screening; Bacillus; Extracellular secretion

资金

  1. Department of Biotechnology, New Delhi, India

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study aimed to optimize the expression and secretion of a thermostable BGL from Pyrococcus furiosus in B. subtilis, resulting in a significant improvement in the yield of PfuBGL. The research demonstrated the high potential of utilizing B. subtilis as a host organism for industrial production of various proteins/enzymes.
Commercial applications of beta-glucosidase (BGL) demands its purity and availability on a large scale. In the present study, we aim to optimize the expression and secretion of a thermostable BGL from Pyrococcus furiosus (PfuBGL) in B. subtilis strain RIK1285. Initial studies with base strain BV002 harboring aprE signal peptide (aprESP) showed PfuBGL yield of 0.743 +/- 0.19 pNP U/ml only. A library of 173 different homologous SPs from B. subtilis 168 genome was fused with target PfuBGL gene (PF0073) in pBE-S vector and extracellularly expressed in RIK1285 strain to identify optimal SP for PfuBGL secretion. High-throughput screening of the resulting SP library for BGL activity with a synthetic substrate followed by systematic scaling of the clones yielded a gene construct with CitHSP reporting a sixteen fold enhancement of PfuBGL secretion in comparison to base strain. Batch fermentation (7.5 L scale) PfuBGL yield of the BV003 strain with CitHSP-PF0073 fusion was observed to be 12.08 +/- 0.21 pNP U/ml with specific activity of 35.52 +/- 0.53 U/mg. Thus, the study represents report on the secretory expression of thermostable PfuBGL using B. subtilis as a host organism and demonstrating its high potential for industrial production of any protein/enzyme.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据