相关参考文献
注意：仅列出部分参考文献，下载原文获取全部文献信息。The 2019 Genitourinary Pathology Society (GUPS) White Paper on Contemporary Grading of Prostate Cancer
Jonathan Epstein et al.
ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE (2021)
Prostatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Controlled for Cancer Grade and Tumor Volume Does Not Have an Independent Effect on Adverse Radical Prostatectomy Outcomes Compared to Usual Acinar Prostatic Adenocarcinoma
Oleksii A. Iakymenko et al.
UROLOGY (2020)
Reporting Practices and Resource Utilization in the Era of Intraductal Carcinoma of the Prostate A Survey of Genitourinary Subspecialists
Jatin S. Gandhi et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2020)
In Organ-confined Prostate Cancer, Tumor Quantitation Not Found to Aid in Prediction of Biochemical Recurrence
Yujiro Ito et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2019)
Impact of 5α-Reductase Inhibitors on Disease Reclassification among Men on Active Surveillance for Localized Prostate Cancer with Favorable Features
Charles Dai et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2018)
Prostate cancer grading: a decade after the 2005 modified system
Jonathan Epstein
MODERN PATHOLOGY (2018)
Contemporary prognostic indicators for prostate cancer incorporating International Society of Urological Pathology recommendations
Lars Egevad et al.
PATHOLOGY (2018)
The effect of 3-month finasteride challenge on biomarkers for predicting cancer outcome on biopsy: Results of a randomized trial
Javier Hernandez et al.
PLOS ONE (2018)
Characterization of a low-risk cohort of grade group 2 prostate cancer patients: Results from the Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital database
Kathleen F. McGinley et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2017)
Limitations in Predicting Organ Confined Prostate Cancer in Patients with Gleason Pattern 4 on Biopsy: Implications for Active Surveillance
Nathan Perlis et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2017)
Contemporary Active Surveillance Candidate Selection, Follow-up Tools, and Expected Outcomes
Laurence Klotz
UROLOGIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA (2017)
Understanding PSA and its derivatives in prediction of tumor volume: Addressing health disparities in prostate cancer risk stratification
Felix M. Chinea et al.
ONCOTARGET (2017)
Improving the evaluation and diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer
Oleksandr N. Kryvenko et al.
CURRENT OPINION IN UROLOGY (2017)
Prognostic Significance of Percentage and Architectural Types of Contemporary Gleason Pattern 4 Prostate Cancer in Radical Prostatectomy
Bonnie Choy et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2016)
Outcomes of Gleason score 3+4=7 prostate cancer with minimal amounts (<6%) vs ≥6% of Gleason pattern 4 tissue in needle biopsy specimens
Gozde Kir et al.
ANNALS OF DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY (2016)
Prostate Cancer Grading A Decade After the 2005 Modified Gleason Grading System
Oleksandr N. Kryvenko et al.
ARCHIVES OF PATHOLOGY & LABORATORY MEDICINE (2016)
Clinical Utility of Quantitative Gleason Grading in Prostate Biopsies and Prostatectomy Specimens
Guido Sauter et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2016)
Definition of Insignificant Tumor Volume of Gleason Score 3+3=6 (Grade Group 1) Prostate Cancer at Radical Prostatectomy-Is it Time to Increase the Threshold?
Oleksandr N. Kryvenko et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2016)
Prognostic Value of Percent Gleason Grade 4 at Prostate Biopsy in Predicting Prostatectomy Pathology and Recurrence
Adam I. Cole et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2016)
Re: Clinical significance of prospectively assigned gleason tertiary pattern 4 in contemporary Gleason score 3+3=6 prostate cancer
Oleksandr N. Kryvenko et al.
PROSTATE (2016)
Prostate-specific Antigen Mass Density-A Measure Predicting Prostate Cancer Volume and Accounting for Overweight and Obesity-related Prostate-specific Antigen Hemodilution
Oleksandr N. Kryvenko et al.
UROLOGY (2016)
Correlation of High Body Mass Index With More Advanced Localized Prostate Cancer at Radical Prostatectomy Is Not Reflected in PSA Level and PSA Density but Is Seen in PSA Mass
Oleksandr N. Kryvenko et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY (2015)
Average Weight of Seminal Vesicles: An Adjustment Factor for Radical Prostatectomy Specimens Weighed With Seminal Vesicles
George A. Tjionas et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2015)
Pathological Characteristics of Low Risk Prostate Cancer Based on Totally Embedded Prostatectomy Specimens
Gregory P. Swanson et al.
PROSTATE (2015)
Gleason Score 3+4=7 Prostate Cancer With Minimal Quantity of Gleason Pattern 4 on Needle Biopsy Is Associated With Low-risk Tumor in Radical Prostatectomy Specimen
Cheng Cheng Huang et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2014)
Pathological Examination of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens in Men with Very Low Risk Disease at Biopsy Reveals Distinct Zonal Distribution of Cancer in Black American Men
Debasish Sundi et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2014)
Biopsy Criteria for Determining Appropriateness for Active Surveillance in the Modern Era
Oleksandr N. Kryvenko et al.
UROLOGY (2014)
Do Adenocarcinomas of the Prostate With Gleason Score (GS) ≤ 6 Have the Potential to Metastasize to Lymph Nodes?
Hillary M. Ross et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2012)
Characteristics of Pelvic Lymph Node Metastases in Prostatic Adenocarcinoma: A Study of 83 Cases
Ji Yoon Yoon et al.
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY (2012)
International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Handling and Staging of Radical Prostatectomy Specimens. Working group 1: specimen handling
Hemamali Samaratunga et al.
MODERN PATHOLOGY (2011)
Systematic assessment of the ability of the number and percentage of positive biopsy cores to predict pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy
Alberto Briganti et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2007)
Percent of prostate needle biopsy cores with cancer is a significant independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence following radical prostatectomy: Results from the search database
SJ Freedland et al.
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY (2003)
Prognostic significance of tumor volume after radical prostatectomy: A Multivariate analysis of pathological prognostic factors
L Salomon et al.
EUROPEAN UROLOGY (2003)
Morphologic and clinical significance of multifocal prostate cancers in radical prostatectomy specimens
AM Wise et al.
UROLOGY (2002)
分享论文
