4.8 Review

Chemoselective Polymerizations

期刊

PROGRESS IN POLYMER SCIENCE
卷 117, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2021.101397

关键词

chemoselective polymerizations; catalysis; microflow technology; switch; external-stimuli; block copolymers

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2019YFA0905000]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [22078150, 21878145, 21504039, 21604037]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Chemoselective polymerizations present a significant challenge in advanced polymer precision synthesis, with issues such as ill-defined products and low efficiency in traditional methods. Significant progress has been made in chemoselective polymerizations through the development of novel catalysis and microflow technology.
More and more controlled polymerization methodologies have been developed in the last decades. However, great challenges still remain in chemoselective polymerizations for advanced polymer precision synthesis. Traditionally, polymerizations in the presence of multifunctional initiators or monomers with more reactive groups suffer from ill-defined products, low efficiency and tedious synthetic steps. Meanwhile, chemoselective copolymerizations from a mixed monomer feedstock is a long-term goal for synthesis of block and multiblock copolymers. Based on the development of novel catalysis, microflow technology, and switchable strategy in the absence/presence of external-stimuli, significant progress has been achieved in chemoselective polymerizations. In this review, chemoselective homopolymerizations (multifunctional initiators and multifunctional monomers) and copolymerizations (mixed monomers and mixed mechanisms) are highlighted in order. The future challenges and opportunities are proposed with the aim to provide the insight into further development of chemoselective polymerizations and advanced polymer precision synthesis.& nbsp; (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据