4.5 Review

Impact of nutraceuticals on markers of systemic inflammation: Potential relevance to cardiovascular diseases-A position paper from the International Lipid Expert Panel (ILEP)

期刊

PROGRESS IN CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASES
卷 67, 期 -, 页码 40-52

出版社

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2021.06.010

关键词

Cardiovascular disease; C-reactive protein; Inflammation; Nutraceuticals; Omega-3; Position paper; Red-yeast rice

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Inflammation plays a crucial role in atherogenesis, and targeting systemic inflammation has shown significant reduction in cardiovascular disease risk. While nutraceuticals have been mostly focused on lipid-lowering, there is a growing interest in using them to reduce inflammatory markers.
Inflammation is a marker of arterial disease stemming from cholesterol-dependent to-independent molecular mechanisms. In recent years, the role of inflammation in atherogenesis has been underpinned by pharmacological approaches targeting systemic inflammation that have led to a significant reduction in cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. Although the use of nutraceuticals to prevent CVD has largely focused on lipid-lowering (e.g, red yeast rice and omega-3 fatty acids), there is growing interest and need, especially now in the time of coronavirus pandemic, in the use of nutraceuticals to reduce inflammatory markers, and potentially the inflammatory CVD burden, however, there is still not enough evidence to confirm this. Indeed, diet is an important lifestyle determinant of health and can influence both systemic and vascular inflammation, to varying extents, according to the individual nutraceutical constituents. Thus, the aim of this Position Paper is to provide the first attempt at recommendations on the use of nutraceuticals with effective anti-inflammatory properties. (c) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据