4.7 Article

Metagenomic insights into the explanation of biofilter performance distinction induced by dissolved oxygen increment

期刊

PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
卷 153, 期 -, 页码 329-338

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2021.07.035

关键词

Secondary effluent; Sequencing batch biofilm reactor (SBBR); Dissolved oxygen (DO); Purification performance; Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification (SND)

资金

  1. Open Research Program from the Agriculture Ministry Key Laboratory of Healthy Freshwater Aquaculture [ZJK201902]
  2. CRSRI Open Research Program [CKWV2019765/KY]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [WUT: 2019III107CG]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study demonstrated that in the novel double-layer-packed sequencing batch biofilm reactors, the optimal DO for performance was 2.0 mg/L, with the aerobic section contributing the most. The variation in DO influenced the bacterial community structure, leading to different performance outcomes.
In this study, a set of novel double-layer-packed sequencing batch biofilm reactors (SBBRs) were constructed to treat secondary effluent with a low carbon-to-nitrogen ratio (C/N = 3.0). All the reactors were operated under identical conditions except dissolved oxygen (DO) in the aerobic section, which was controlled at seven different levels (0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 2.5, 3.5 and 4.5 mg/L). It was found that the aerobic section contributed most to performance at an optimal DO of 2.0 mg/L. The change in DO accounted for the varied bacterial communities, which resulted in different performances. Both bacterial community structure and potential functions displayed close associations with performance implying nutrients were mainly removed by simultaneous nitrification-endogenous denitrification and phosphorus removal (SNEDPR) process. Moreover, the proliferation of nonfunctional nitrifiers/denitrifiers led to the inhibition of denitrification resulting in a lower removal of total dissolved nitrogen and phosphorus. (c) 2021 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据