4.7 Article

Synthesis of green nanomaterial and discussion on its suppression performance and mechanism to aluminum dust explosion

期刊

PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
卷 151, 期 -, 页码 355-364

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2021.05.031

关键词

Aluminum dust explosion; Nano suppressant; Flame propagation behaviors; Suppression mechanism

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51922025, 52006026, 51874066]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M670759]
  3. Science and Technology Major Project of Liaoning Province [2019JH1/10300002]
  4. Elite Foundation of Revitalizing Liaoning [XLYC1907161]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The experimental results show that MCN can significantly reduce the flame propagation speed and intensity of aluminum dust, providing a potential direction for developing efficient suppressants for aluminum dust explosions.
In order to develop a green and efficient nano suppressant for aluminum (Al) dust explosion, MCN with layered structure was synthesized with low-cost urea as precursor via simple calcination technology. The suppression performance of MCN on the flame propagation of 30 mu m and 5 mu m Al dust with the concentration of 1000 g/m(3) was experimentally studied. Results showed that with the addition of MCN increasing, the flame luminous intensity, flame propagation velocity and fluctuating trend of mixture-Al dust were greatly decreased. After adding 500 g/m(3) and 700 g/m(3) to 30 mu m and 5 mu m Al dust, the average flame propagation velocities declined by 73.24 % and 94.07 % separately. The minimum inerting concentration of 30 mu m and 5 mu m Al dust was 600 g/m(3) and 900 g/m(3). Explosion residuals were analyzed to further reveal the suppression mechanism of MCN in detail. The good performance of MCN provided a potential direction to develop efficient suppressants on the suppression of Al dust explosions to improve process safety. (C) 2021 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据