4.7 Article

Characteristic evaluation of aluminum dust explosion venting with high static activation pressure

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psep.2021.05.039

关键词

Dust explosion venting; Flame length; Flame width; Reduced pressure; External pressure

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51922025, 51874066]
  2. Science and Technology Major Project of Liaoning Province [2019JH1/10300002]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [DUT20GJ201]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Experiments were conducted to study the venting of aluminum dust explosions, obtaining new fitting formulas for flame length and width which are important references for venting safety area design considering various factors. Results showed that external pressure attenuates inversely proportional to distance, contradicting the standard recommendation.
Aluminum dust explosion venting experiments with static activation pressure ranging from 70 kPa to 280 kPa were conducted in the 20 L spherical chamber with venting diameters from 20 mm to 125 mm. For the case of high activation pressure, the maximum flame length in experiments is 1.64 m, which is close to the prediction of standard, while the maximum width is significantly smaller than the prediction. New fitting formulas in a laboratory scale for flame length and width are obtained, which provide a reference for venting safety area design, and the effect of activation pressure, dust concentration and venting area are taken into account. By the comparison, the external pressure prediction of EN14491 shows a good performance and NFPA68 has an opposite trend with experiments. Based on the experimental results, it is found that the the external pressure attenuation is inversely proportional to the distance, which is different with the coefficient of the distance suggested by the standard EN 14491. (c) 2021 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据