4.8 Article

Developmental HCN channelopathy results in decreased neural progenitor proliferation and microcephaly in mice

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2009393118

关键词

HCN channelopathy; brain development; microcephaly; cell cycle

资金

  1. German Research Foundation [IS63/3-2, IS63/10-1, FOR 2715]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The development of the cerebral cortex relies on the controlled division of neural stem and progenitor cells, with ion channels playing a crucial role in shaping the intrinsic properties of precursor cells and neurons. Dysfunction in HCN channels can impair proliferation and cause microcephaly in rodents, highlighting the importance of ion channels in cortical development in mammals.
The development of the cerebral cortex relies on the controlled division of neural stem and progenitor cells. The requirement for precise spatiotemporal control of proliferation and cell fate places a high demand on the cell division machinery, and defective cell division can cause microcephaly and other brain malformations. Cell-extrinsic and-intrinsic factors govern the capacity of cortical progenitors to produce large numbers of neurons and glia within a short developmental time window. In particular, ion channels shape the intrinsic biophysical properties of precursor cells and neurons and control their membrane potential throughout the cell cycle. We found that hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated cation (HCN) channel subunits are expressed in mouse, rat, and human neural progenitors. Loss of HCN channel function in rat neural stem cells impaired their proliferation by affecting the cell-cycle progression, causing G1 accumulation and dysregulation of genes associated with human microcephaly. Transgene-mediated, dominant-negative loss of HCN channel function in the embryonic mouse telencephalon resulted in pronounced microcephaly. Together, our findings suggest a role for HCN channel subunits as a part of a general mechanism influencing cortical development in mammals.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据