4.8 Article

Genome-wide screen identifies curli amyloid fibril as a bacterial component promoting host neurodegeneration

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2106504118

关键词

Parkinson's disease; curli; neurodegeneration; microbe-host interaction

资金

  1. NIH Office of Research Infrastructure Programs [P40 OD010440]
  2. Food and Health Bureau of Hong Kong (Health and Medical Research Fund) [07183186]
  3. Research Grants Council of Hong Kong [27104219, C7026-20G]
  4. University of Hong Kong [201910159087]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study reveals the critical role of gut microbiota in regulating neurodegenerative diseases, particularly through influencing the formation and aggregation of amyloid fibrils. This provides a new research direction for the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases.
Growing evidence indicates that gut microbiota play a critical role in regulating the progression of neurodegenerative diseases such as Parkinson's disease. The molecular mechanism underlying such microbe-host interaction is unclear. In this study, by feeding Caenorhabditis elegans expressing human alpha-syn with Escherichia coli knockout mutants, we conducted a genome-wide screen to identify bacterial genes that promote host neurodegeneration. The screen yielded 38 genes that fall into several genetic pathways including curli formation, lipopolysaccharide assembly, and adenosylcobalamin synthesis among others. We then focused on the curli amyloid fibril and found that genetically deleting or pharmacologically inhibiting the curli major subunit CsgA in E. coli reduced alpha-syn-induced neuronal death, restored mitochondrial health, and improved neuronal functions. CsgA secreted by the bacteria colocalized with alpha-syn inside neurons and promoted alpha-syn aggregation through crossseeding. Similarly, curli also promoted neurodegeneration in C. elegans models of Alzheimer's disease, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, and Huntington's disease and in human neuroblastoma cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据