4.8 Article

Relative mobility of screw versus edge dislocations controls the ductile-to-brittle transition in metals

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2110596118

关键词

brittle; ductile; dislocation; mobility

资金

  1. Xi'an Jiaotong University
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51971170, 51922082]
  3. 111 Project of China [BP2018008]
  4. Innovation Project of Shaanxi Province [2017KTPT-12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Body-centered cubic metals exhibit a ductile-to-brittle transition at a critical temperature, controlled by the ratio of screw dislocation velocity to edge dislocation velocity. A physical model shows the importance of coordinated movement of screw and edge dislocation segments for sustaining dislocation multiplication. High relative mobility is crucial for the transition of dislocation sources from disposable to regeneratable ones.
Body-centered cubic metals including steels and refractory metals suffer from an abrupt ductile-to-brittle transition (DBT) at a critical temperature, hampering their performance and applications. Temperature-dependent dislocation mobility and dislocation nucleation have been proposed as the potential factors responsible for the DBT. However, the origin of this sudden switch from toughness to brittleness still remains a mystery. Here, we discover that the ratio of screw dislocation velocity to edge dislocation velocity is a controlling factor responsible for the DBT. A physical model was conceived to correlate the efficiency of Frank-Read dislocation source with the relative mobility of screw versus edge dislocations. A sufficiently high relative mobility is a prerequisite for the coordinated movement of screw and edge segments to sustain dislocation multiplication. Nanoindentation experiments found that DBT in chromium requires a critical mobility ratio of 0.7, above which the dislocation sources transition from disposable to regeneratable ones. The proposed model is also supported by the experimental results of iron, tungsten, and aluminum.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据