4.8 Article

DLL1 orchestrates CD8+T cells to induce long-term vascular normalization and tumor regression

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2020057118

关键词

Delta-like 1; long-term tumor vascular normalization; tumor microenvironment; cancer immunotherapy

资金

  1. National Program on Key Research Project of China [2016YFC1302400]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81972877, 81372245]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Prevention [GZN1201904]
  4. Collaborative Innovation Center of Hematology
  5. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Elevated levels of DLL1 in the TME promote long-term tumor vascular normalization, accumulation of CD8+ T cells, M1-like macrophage polarization, and increase the sensitivity of anti-CTLA4 therapy in resistant tumors.
The immunosuppressive and hypoxic tumor microenvironment (TME) remains a major obstacle to impede cancer immunotherapy. Here, we showed that elevated levels of Delta-like 1 (DLL1) in the breast and lung TME induced long-term tumor vascular normalization to alleviate tumor hypoxia and promoted the accumulation of interferon gamma (IFN-gamma)-expressing CD8+ T cells and the polarization of M1-like macrophages. Moreover, increased DLL1 levels in the TME sensitized anti-cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (anti-CTLA4) treatment in its resistant tumors, resulting in tumor regression and prolonged survival. Mechanically, in vivo depletion of CD8+ T cells or host IFN-gamma deficiency reversed tumor growth inhibition and abrogated DLL1-induced tumor vascular normalization without affecting DLL1-mediated macrophage polarization. Together, these results demonstrate that elevated DLL1 levels in the TME promote durable tumor vascular normalization in a CD8+ T cell- and IFN-gamma-dependent manner and potentiate anti-CTLA4 therapy. Our findings unveil DLL1 as a potential target to persistently normalize the TME to facilitate cancer immunotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据