4.8 Article

Periscope Proteins are variable-length regulators of bacterial cell surface interactions

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2101349118

关键词

protein structure bacterial surface proteins multidomain proteins

资金

  1. Medical Research Council Discovery Award [MC_PC_15073]
  2. European Molecular Biology Laboratory
  3. British Heart Foundation [FS/12/36/29588, PG/17/19/32862]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Changes at the cell surface enable bacteria to survive in dynamic environments, with Periscope Proteins identified as a common mechanism for bacterial surface alteration through protein length variation. These proteins, forming elongated rod-like structures, can have over 50 distinct variants implicated in host colonization and biofilm formation. While sequence divergence in large multidomain proteins may reduce misfolding between domains, Periscope Proteins break this rule and suggest that their length variability is crucial in regulating bacterial interactions with host surfaces and the immune system.
Changes at the cell surface enable bacteria to survive in dynamic environments, such as diverse niches of the human host. Here, we reveal Periscope Proteins as a widespread mechanism of bacterial surface alteration mediated through protein length variation. Tandem arrays of highly similar folded domains can form an elongated rod-like structure; thus, variation in the number of domains determines how far an N-terminal host ligand binding domain projects from the cell surface. Supported by newly available long read genome sequencing data, we propose that this class could contain over 50 distinct proteins, including those implicated in host colonization and biofilm formation by human pathogens. In large multidomain proteins, sequence divergence between adjacent domains appears to reduce interdomain misfolding. Periscope Proteins break this rule, suggesting that their length variability plays an important role in regulating bacterial interactions with host surfaces, other bacteria, and the immune system.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据