4.8 Article

TP53 missense mutations in PDAC are associated with enhanced fibrosis and an immunosuppressive microenvironment

出版社

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2025631118

关键词

p53; PDAC; fibrosis; immune infiltration; tumor microenvironment

资金

  1. Thompson Family Foundation
  2. Dr. Miriam and Sheldon G. Adelson Medical Research Foundation
  3. Moross Integrated Cancer Center
  4. Sergio Lombroso Program

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Missense p53 mutations in PDAC patients can suppress CD8(+) T cell infiltration into tumors and hinder the immune system’s ability to eliminate cancer cells. Silencing mutp53 can reduce tumor size and fibrotic response.
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal cancer, which is refractory to all currently available treatments and bears dismal prognosis. About 70% of all PDAC cases harbor mutations in the TP53 tumor suppressor gene. Many of those are missense mu-tations, resulting in abundant production of mutant p53 (mutp53) protein in the cancer cells. Analysis of human PDAC patient data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) revealed a negative association between the presence of missense mutp53 and infiltration of CD8(+) T cells into the tumor. Moreover, CD8(+) T cell infiltration was negatively correlated with the expression of fibrosis-associated genes. Im-portantly, silencing of endogenous mutp53 in KPC cells, derived from mouse PDAC tumors driven by mutant Kras and mutp53, down-regulated fibrosis and elevated CD8(+) T cell infiltration in the tumors arising upon orthotopic injection of these cells into the pancreas of syngeneic mice. Moreover, the tumors generated by mutp53-silenced KPC cells were markedly smaller than those elicited by mutp53-proficient control KPC cells. Altogether, our findings suggest that missense p53 mutations may contribute to worse PDAC prognosis by promoting a more vigorous fibrotic tumor microenvironment and impeding the ability of the immune system to eliminate the cancer cells.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据