4.3 Article

Monitoring the continuous manufacture of a polymeric foam via a thermokinetic-informed acoustic technique

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/09544089211026549

关键词

Continuous monitoring; thermoset; autocatalytic kinetics; polyurethane; foams; ultrasound; stiffness

资金

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/L014998/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

By utilizing the longitudinal speed of sound of an ultrasonic signal combined with a thermokinetic model, in situ, in-line, non-destructive and continuous monitoring of foam curing process can be achieved. Speed of sound measurements are suitable for continuous characterization of different foaming stages, determining the degree of cure, and predicting mechanical properties of cured foam samples.
Polymer foams are difficult to characterise due to rapidly evolving physical features from liquid to porous solid. Swift changes in volume, porosity and moduli render many techniques challenging for the characterisation of the foam curing during a manufacturing process. A technique that employs the longitudinal speed of sound of an ultrasonic signal, informed by a thermokinetic model, is proposed as an in situ, in-line, non-destructive and continuous monitoring tool during the production of rigid polyurethane foams. This study demonstrates that speed of sound measurements are suitable for (a) continuous characterisation of different foaming stages in the polymer reaction and curing; (b) determining the degree of cure for the continuous monitoring of foams, and (c) predicting mechanical properties (i.e., stiffness and Poisson's ratio) of cured foam samples. The validity of this monitoring technique is confirmed by comparison with well-established methods that use physical characteristics (e.g., expansion rate, electrical properties), thermo-kinetic models and mechanical testing. This method positions itself as a monitoring tool and convenient method for determining material stiffness during production.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据