4.5 Article

Dynamic modelling of a servo self-pierce riveting (SPR) process

出版社

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/09544054211037493

关键词

Assembly; process modelling and planning; optimisation; production machines; self-pierce riveting

资金

  1. UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/M508135/1]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Self-pierce riveting is a complex joining process that creates a mechanical interlock between multiple layers of material. Finding the optimal process parameters is challenging, but a new system-level model has been proposed to predict system dynamics and joint quality accurately, reducing costs in SPR system design and validation.
Self-pierce riveting (SPR) is a complex joining process where multiple layers of material are joined by creating a mechanical interlock via the simultaneous deformation of the inserted rivet and surrounding material. Due to the large number of variables which influence the resulting joint, finding the optimum process parameters has traditionally posed a challenge in the design of the process. Furthermore, there is a gap in knowledge regarding how changes made to the system may affect the produced joint. In this paper, a new system-level model of an inertia-based SPR system is proposed, consisting of a physics-based model of the riveting machine and an empirically-derived model of the joint. Model predictions are validated against extensive experimental data for multiple sets of input conditions, defined by the setting velocity, motor current limit and support frame type. The dynamics of the system and resulting head height of the joint are predicted to a high level of accuracy. Via a model-based case study, changes to the system are identified, which enable either the cycle time or energy consumption to be substantially reduced without compromising the overall quality of the produced joint. The predictive capabilities of the model may be leveraged to reduce the costs involved in the design and validation of SPR systems and processes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据