4.2 Article

A novel delivery of curcumin by the efficient nanoliposomal approach against Leishmania major

期刊

PREPARATIVE BIOCHEMISTRY & BIOTECHNOLOGY
卷 51, 期 10, 页码 990-997

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/10826068.2021.1885045

关键词

Curcumin; drug delivery; in vitro; Leishmania; nanoliposome

资金

  1. School of Medicine, Yazd Error! Hyperlink reference not valid.. Yazd, Iran [4781]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanoliposomal curcumin prepared using thin-film hydration method exhibited high encapsulation efficiency, neutral surface charge, and significant inhibitory effect on Leishmania major, suggesting its potential as a promising candidate for further research in the treatment of Leishmaniasis.
Several side effects and drug resistance accompany the current therapies for Leishmaniasis. Nanoliposomal curcumin is applied as a new therapy approach instead of current therapy. In this study, nanoliposomal curcumin was prepared using thin-film hydration method and characterized based on encapsulation efficiency, size, and zeta potential. Curcumin was successfully loaded into nanoliposomes with an encapsulation efficiency of 92%. The surface charge of the nanoparticle was neutral, and the size of nanoparticle was 176.5 nm. Nanoliposomal curcumin is in spherical shape without any agglomeration. Cell viability assay was performed on HFF cell line to show biocompatibility of liposome nanoparticles. Anti-Leishmanial effect of different concentrations of liposomal curcumin (0.05-30 mu g mL(-1)) and amphotericin B (25 mu g mL(-1)) were studied on Leishmania major [MRHO/IR/75/ER] at various hours (24, 48, and 72) using hemocytometer technique. Nanoliposomal curcumin inhibitory concentration (IC50) at hours 24, 48, and 72 were 6.41, 3.8, and 2.33 mu g mL(-1), respectively. As prepared nanoliposomal curcumin showed a significant antileishmanial effect and induced a better and more tangible effect on the survival of L. major promastigotes and could be suitable candidates for further investigations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据