4.7 Article

Dispersed spherical shell-shaped palygorskite/carbon/polyaniline composites with advanced microwave absorption performances

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 387, 期 -, 页码 277-286

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.04.028

关键词

Palygorskite; Palygorskite; carbon; polyaniline; Nanoparticle dispersion; Spherical shell; Microwave absorption

资金

  1. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of HighefficiencyUtilization of Coal and Green Chemical Engineering [2021K19]
  2. Opening Project of State Key Laboratory of High Performance Ceramics and Superfine Microstructure [SKL202003SIC]
  3. Anhui International Joint Research Center for Nano Carbonbased Materials and Environmental Health [2020R0109]
  4. Shenzhen Technology University (SZTU)
  5. Natural Science Foundation of Top Talent of SZTU [2019010801002]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In this study, palygorskite was modified to prepare Pal/C/PANI ternary composites, which exhibit promising electromagnetic absorption performances with potential applications in microwave absorption.
Palygorskite was coated with a thin layer of carbon by using a hydrothermal process with glucose, in order to form palygorskite/carbon (Pal/C) composites, which were then used as a template to load polyaniline through in-situ polymerization, thus obtaining dispersed spherical shell-shaped palygorskite/carbon/polyaniline (Pal/C/ PANI) ternary composites. The Pal/C/PANI composites exhibit promising electromagnetic absorption performances, which can be optimized by adjusting the content of Pal/C. In this case, palygorskite acts as a skeleton and dispersion agent, which effectively prevents the agglomeration of carbon and polyaniline. Due to the improved impedance matching and increased dielectric loss, the Pal/C/PANI composites display an optimal reflec-tion loss of -74 dB at 6.24 GHz, with a maximum effective absorption bandwidth of 4.96 GHz. Such composites could be candidates as high performance microwave absorbers. (c) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据