4.7 Article

Research on the structure of the cylindrical hydrocyclone spigot to mitigate the misplacement of particles

期刊

POWDER TECHNOLOGY
卷 387, 期 -, 页码 61-71

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.powtec.2021.04.013

关键词

Cylindrical hydrocyclone; Spigot upper diameter; Flow field; Separation performance

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51874075, 51974066]
  2. Open Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Mineral Processing [BGRIMM-KJSKL-201910]
  3. State Key Laboratory of Process Automation in Mining Metallurgy [BGRIMM-KZSKL-2018-12]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This paper investigates the flow field characteristics and separation performance of cylindrical hydrocyclones with different spigot upper diameters using the TFM model. The study finds that the spigot upper diameter significantly impacts the separation efficiency, with both undersize and oversize diameters leading to particle misplacement and negative classification performance.
The misplacement of particles in the hydrocyclone is the primary reason for the deterioration of separation sharpness and has obtained extensive attention. This paper presents a study on the flow field characteristics and separation performance of cylindrical hydrocyclones with different spigot upper diameter by the TFM model. The numerical results indicate that the spigot upper diameter has a slight effect on the tangential velocity, while a smaller spigot upper diameter implies a higher turbulence intensity and an immense internal swirling flow region, causing more coarse particles misplaced in the overflow. However, an oversize spigot upper diam-eter denotes a superabundant circulating flow, reducing the fine particles misplaced in the underflow, and in-creasing coarse particles misplaced in the overflow. Under the combined action of the internal swirling flow and the circulating flow, both undersize and oversize spigot upper diameter generates a negative classification performance of the cylindrical hydrocyclone. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier B.V.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据