4.7 Article

Effects of combination of mannan-oligosaccharides and β-glucan on growth performance, intestinal morphology, and immune gene expression in broiler chickens

期刊

POULTRY SCIENCE
卷 100, 期 12, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2021.101483

关键词

Mannan-oligosaccharide; beta-glucan; prebiotic; broiler chicken

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study found that both mannan-oligosaccharides and beta-glucan improved growth performance in broiler chickens during the starter phase, with beta-glucan additionally increasing body weight gain. Furthermore, the combination of MOS and beta-glucan resulted in higher villi height in the jejunum of the chickens, indicating potential benefits for intestinal health.
The study was conducted to evaluate the effects of the combination of mannan-oligosaccharides (MOS) and beta-glucan on growth performance, intestinal morphology, and immune gene expression in broiler chickens. A total of 640, one-day-old male Cobb 500 broilers were randomly allocated into 32 pens with 8 replicates and 20 birds per pen. Thirty-two pens were divided into 4 treatments, including control, 0.04% MOS, 0.002% beta-glucan, and a combination of MOS and beta-glucan. Growth performance was measured on d14, 28, and 35. The ileum and cecal tonsils were collected from one bird per pen at 21 and 35 d of age for further analyses of immune gene expression. Duodenum, jejunum, and ileum were collected for intestinal morphology on d 35. Results indicated that both MOS and beta-glucan improved growth performance during starter phase (P < 0.05). In addition, b-glucan further increased body weight gain of birds from d 0 to 28 (P < 0.05). Furthermore, the combination of MOS and eta-glucan presented higher villi height in the jejunum on d 35 (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences for gene expressions of immune responses on d 21 and 35. In conclusion, the application of prebiotic combination of MOS and beta-glucan might perform multiple pathways, improving growth performance in broiler chickens.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据