4.7 Article

Buckling analysis of graphene nanoplatelets-doped carbon/aramid hybrid polymer composite plates

期刊

POLYMER COMPOSITES
卷 42, 期 11, 页码 5712-5720

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pc.26253

关键词

axial buckling; carbon; aramid intraply; epoxy; graphene nanoplatelets; lateral buckling

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study investigated the effects of graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) on the axial and lateral buckling behavior of carbon/aramid hybrid-woven epoxy nanocomposites. The addition of GNPs resulted in enhanced critical buckling loads, with the maximum enhancement observed at 0.1 wt% GNPs. However, further addition of GNPs led to a decrease in critical buckling loads due to agglomeration. Failure surfaces were examined with scanning electron microscopy to understand the relationship between buckling behavior and failure types of the composite samples.
In the present study, the effects of graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) contents on the axial and lateral buckling behavior of carbon/aramid hybrid-woven epoxy nanocomposites were investigated. The composite plates were fabricated with different concentrations of GNPs (0.1, 0.25, and 0.5 wt%) by vacuum-assisted hand lay-up method. The addition of GNPs has resulted in enhancement in axial and lateral critical buckling loads. The maximum enhancement in both axial and lateral critical buckling reached with 0.1 wt% GNPs addition. These percent enhancement values in axial critical buckling loads were 25.7%, 5.2%, and, 14% with fixed-fixed, fixed-free, and free-free boundary conditions, respectively. For lateral critical buckling load, the maximum enhancement was recorded as 20.6% compared to the pure control sample. Also, with the further addition of GNPs, critical buckling loads decreased, which is interpreted because of the agglomeration of GNPs. The failure surfaces were then observed with scanning electron microscopy to examine the link between the buckling behavior and failure types of the composite samples.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据