4.7 Article

Fabrication of recyclable nucleating agent and its effect on crystallization, gas barrier, thermal, and mechanical performance of Poly(L-lactide)

期刊

POLYMER
卷 231, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2021.124121

关键词

Ferroferric oxide; Poly(L-lactide); Nucleating agent

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation Project of Chongqing [cstc2020jcyj-msxmX0401]
  2. Opening Project of Beijing Key Laboratory of Quality Evaluation Technology for Hygiene and Safety of Plastics (BeijingTechnology and Business University) [QETHSP2021002]
  3. Opening Project of State Key Laboratory of Polymer Materials Engineering (Sichuan University) [sklpme2020-4-10]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The study demonstrates that using magnetic nanoparticles as nucleating agents can effectively improve the crystallinity, gas barrier properties, thermal performance, and mechanical performance of PLLA, while maintaining high recyclability.
Herein, a recyclable nucleating agent for poly(L-lactide) (PLLA) was fabricated via taking advantage of grafting biodegradable poly(3-hydroxybutyrate)-diol onto the surface of magnetic nanoparticles (ferroferric oxide, Fe3O4). Its effectiveness in improving crystallinity, gas barriers, thermal, and mechanical performance of PLLA are investigated. Core-shell structure, which is the combination of PHB-diol (shell) and magnetic nanoparticle (core), are detected by means of transmission electron microscope. Differential scanning calorimeter results suggest Fe3O4@SiO2-PHB (MM) nanoparticles exert great potential in accelerating the crystallization rate. Besides, with the increment of crystallinity for PLLA matrix, oxygen permeability and water vapor permeability are reduced, while thermal stability and mechanical property increases. Most importantly, this magnetic nucleating agent can be recollected and re-manufactured into new batch of PLLA composites without losing the nucleation efficiency, which successfully keep consistent with recyclable and highly-efficient aspiration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据