4.5 Article

Novel bisthiazole ligand and its copper(II) complex with unusual seven membered ring: Synthesis, characterization, experimental and theoretical study of the effect of ligand flexibility, and antimicrobial activity

期刊

POLYHEDRON
卷 209, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.poly.2021.115490

关键词

Copper(II) complexes; Bisthiazole; X-ray diffraction; DFT studies; Antimicrobial activity

资金

  1. PEDECIBA Quimica
  2. FAPESP [2017/15850-0]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A novel bisthiazole ligand and its copper(II) complex were synthesized and characterized in terms of structure and antimicrobial activity. The ligand forms pentacoordinated copper(II) center with intermediate geometry, showing potential antimicrobial properties.
In the search of antimicrobial agents a novel bisthiazole ligand containing a methylamine linker (ethyl 2-((2-methylthiazole-4-yl)methylamino)thiazole-4-carboxylate (BTa) and its copper(II) complex [CuCl2BTa]center dot 2H(2)O were synthetized. Both compounds were characterized by analytical and spectroscopic methods. Single crystal X-ray diffraction of copper complex evidence a pentacoordinated copper(II) center of intermediate geometry forming 5 and 7 membered chelate rings with BTa acting as a tridentate ligand leaving the amine N-H group in the thiazole linker available for participation in intermolecular interactions. Structure packing was analyzed by means of Hirshfeld surfaces, 2D fingerprint plots and lattice interaction energies were assessed. In order to deepen the understanding of the coordination to the flexible ligand DFT studies were carried out at the B3LYP/LANL2DZ level of theory. Calculated FTIR frequencies were used to perform a Vibrational Energy Distribution Analysis (VEDA) where potential energy distribution of vibrational was determined. Minimum inhibitory concentrations for BTa and CuBTa on E. coli ATCC 25922, S. aureus ATCC 25923, P. aeruginosa ATCC 9027 and C. albicans ATCC 10231 were determined.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据