4.6 Article

Nitrogen and boron nutrition in grafted watermelon II: Impact on nutrient accumulation in fruit rind and flesh

期刊

PLOS ONE
卷 16, 期 5, 页码 -

出版社

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252437

关键词

-

资金

  1. Cukurova University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit [FBA-2018-10970]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This study evaluated the impact of increasing N and B doses on nutrient uptake in watermelon fruits, finding that 270 kg ha(-1) N and 2 kg ha(-1) B were optimal for nutrient uptake.
Turkey ranks second in watermelon (Citrullus lunatus L.) production globally and the highest production is witnessed for Cukurova plains the country. Although watermelon is extensively cultivated in the Cukurova region, studies on optimum nitrogen (N) and boron (B) doses for watermelon cultivation are quite limited. This study, evaluated the impact of increasing N (0, 90, 180 and 270 kg ha(-1)) and B (0 and 2 kg ha(-1) B) doses on nutrient uptake in rind (exocarp) and flesh (endocarp) of watermelon fruit. Grafted watermelon variety 'Starburst', widely cultivated in the region was used as experimental material. The concentrations of different macro and micronutrients were analyzed from fruit rind and flesh. Individual and interactive effect of N and B doses significantly altered macro and micronutrients' uptake in rind and flesh. Higher amounts of macro and micronutrients were accumulated in rind than flesh. Nutrients' uptake was increased with increasing N doses, whereas B had limited impact. The accumulated nutrients were within the safe limits for human consumption. The N concentrations of rind and flesh increased with increasing N dose. Similarly, B concentration in rind and flesh and N concentration in rind significantly increased, while N concentration in flesh decreased with B application. It was concluded that 270 kg ha(-1) N and 2 kg ha(-1) B are optimum for better nutrient uptake in watermelon fruit. Thus, these doses must be used for watermelon cultivation in Cukurova plains of the country.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据